My Genographic Journey

GENETIC HISTORY: Julio León Peixoto Schwab

Current distribution of G haplotypes

This external site has 10 tables, one for each of G1, G2, ..., G10, showing the current distribution of G haplotypes, including recent migrations.

The table below is an aggregate I constructed from these 10 tables. These results should be interpreted with care; see warning below the table.

	Population category Region [Ethnic group]	Percent within population category
1	Digora, Caucasus [Ossetians]	9.68
2	Epirus, Greece	7.14
3	Thessaly, Greece	6.67
4	Marche, Eastern Italy	5.56
5	Cajun [European-American]	4.55
6	Pennsylvania [European-American]	4.47
7	Bulgaria	4.12
8	Tyrol, Western Austria	3.93
9	Bologna, Italy	3.92
10	Maryland [Hispanic-American]	3.85
11	Eastern Norway	3.53
12	Uppsala, Sweden	3.50
13	Rostock, Mecklenburg	3.45
14	Dusseldorf, Westphalia	3.34
15	Miercurea Ciuc, Romania [Szekely]	3.30
16	Lousiana [European-American]	3.23
17	Maryland [European-American]	3.12
18	Oslo, Norway	3.03
19	Cape Town, South Africa [European]	3.00
20	Freiburg, Baden-Wurttemburg	2.99
21	Indiana [European-American]	2.94
22	Indiana [African-American]	2.70
23	Latium, Central Italy	2.70
24	Caucasus [Georgian]	2.60
25	Budapest, Hungary	2.57
26	Veneto, Northern Italy	2.49
27	Liguria, Western Italy	2.46
28	Madgeburg, Saxony-Anhalt	2.46
29	Lyon, France	2.40
30	Blekinge, Sweden	2.38
31	Ostergotland/Jonkoping, Sweden	2.38
32	Leipzig, Saxony	2.37
33	London, England	2.30
34	Friesland, Northern Netherlands	2.27
35	Sweden	2.23
36	Asturias, Northern Spain	2.22
37	Northern Norway	2.22
38	Bern, Switzerland	2.19
39	Virginia [African-American]	2.13
40	Skaraborg, Sweden	2.12
41	Central Norway	2.08
42	Groningen, Northern Netherlands	2.08
43	Isfahan, Iran	2.08
44	Warsaw, Central Poland	2.08
45	Madeira, Portugal	2.04
46	Madrid, Central-East Spain	2.02
47	Strasbourg, Alsace	2.02
48	Cordoba, Argentina	2.00
49	Zagreb, Croatia	2.00
50	Romania	1.96
51	Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemburg	1.96
52	Umbria, Central Italy	1.96
53	Chemnitz, Saxony	1.94
54	Munich, Bavaria	1.94
55	Connecticut [Hispanic-American]	1.92
56	Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate	1.92
57	Krakow, Poland	1.87
58	Paris, France	1.84
59	Missouri [African-American]	1.79
60	Missouri [European-American]	1.69
61	Lombardy, Italy	1.65
62	Bulgaria [Turks]	1.64
63	Western Norway	1.56
64	Berlin, Brandenburg	1.55
65	Sicily, Southern Italy	1.51
66	Cologne, Westphalia	1.48
67	Puglia, Southern Italy	1.43
68	Valencia, Eastern Spain	1.42
69	Eastern Hungary [Roma]	1.41
70	Central Portugal	1.40
71	Tuscany, Central Italy	1.38
72	Texas [Hispanic-American]	1.35
73	Ireland	1.32
74	Suwalki, Poland	1.22
75	Lunca de Sus, Romania [Csango]	1.19
76	Bydgoszcz, Northern Poland	1.18
77	Moscow, Russia	1.18
78	Dresden, Saxony	1.16
79	Leiden, Netherlands	1.04
80	Birmingham, England	1.03
81	Corund, Romania [Szekely]	1.02
82	Finland	1.00
83	South Caucasus [Armenian]	1.00
84	Athens, Greece	0.99
85	Santiago de Compostela, Spain	0.97
86	Greifswald, Pomerania	0.96
87	Lausanne, Switzerland	0.93
88	Gdansk, Northern Poland	0.91
89	Ljubljana, Slovenia	0.83
90	Wroclaw, Western Poland	0.83
91	Zaragoza, Aragon	0.83
92	Choco, Colombia	0.75
93	Hamburg, Northern Germany	0.73
94	Buenos Aires, Argentina [Europeans]	0.67
95	Macedonia	0.67
96	Sao Paulo, Brazil [Europeans]	0.67
97	New York City [European-American]	0.65
98	Bialystok, Poland [Byelorussians]	0.64
99	Vilnius, Lithuania	0.64
100	Kiev, Ukraine	0.55
101	Northern Portugal	0.55
102	Munster, Westphalia	0.51
103	Reunion Island [Creole Blanc]	0.51
104	Barcelona, Catalonia	0.45
105	Halle, Saxony-Anhalt	0.43
106	USA [European-American]	0.42
107	Argentina [European]	0.33
108	Antioquia, Colombia [European]	0.25

Note: The above table was obtained from the 10 tables in the rootsweb site as follows:

The categories of the 10 tables were combined, deleting duplicates and near-duplicates (like "Berlin, Germany" and Berlin, Brandenburg").

For each population category, the values of the 10 tables were added.

Warning: I'm not sure whether adding the values of the 10 G-tables is a valid procedure. Also, these numbers appear to contradict percentages (like those in the Georgia region) provided by other sources. Take these results as tentative until I investigate further.